Racism in “Heart of Darkness” and “Apocalypse Now” Essay

The halt Heart of iniquity and the movie Apocalypse Now are two works dealing with deep issues of evil. (Beyond imperialism, because the evil of imperialism has a root. For example, crack the nut) They make places boiling down to a discussion of racism. The Thames River as in any(prenominal) mythology is a source of life. At the end, Marlow comes upon Kurtzs Intended and said, An object of the fecund. Also, these two works deal with how a man is surrounded by evil acts and evil minds to fight of the fire fueled by the society. They as well talks active how a character is a racist, when that character understandably condemns his way of life by leaving the Congo, and confirms the ills of society by prevarication about them.Firstly, I echo that the racism claims are overstated, in two ways. A) Conrads racism, such as it is, is directed not at bleak people as a whole but rather as Africans. I hazard the prejudice must be recognized as activism, or whatever the proper term is , rather than as racism. B) Conrad is critical, not solely of Africans and their way of life, but also of European culture. Hes just as anti- albumen as he is also anti-black. Addition every(prenominal)y, I think that Conrad may be considered a racist if and only if you decide that the exposition of racism is thinking your race is better, but I really take int think that he could be considered a white supremacist or that he really contained a deep hatred for Africans.In fact, I wear upont think that he was even that serious on his own race. It is because that over date he describes the presence of the white imperialist or any white people in general, he describes them in a bitter, dark way. And while he describes the Africans in a sort of bluff way as natural, rustic, raw people. I also think he does it in a much lighter way. I feignt think he criticizes the way they were. I just think he is ignorant of the political correctness found in todays society.Moreover, I dont consider the answer is simple bountiful to just say hotshot is good and the other is bad. We see to pass off in mind when this contain was pen. In that time period the other didnt really have much perception at all on what the African people were like. He only could go by the common knowledge of the day that wasnt very pleasant. I dont think that we can expect an author in that time to be a non-racist.Ever since I read that article, I have thought of the book as being pretty disturbing. I dont know if I would have considered this book quite so frustrating. If I had not read that article, since the racism is the only part of the book that I have been able to focus on. I still think it is very well written and interesting, but it is more difficult to whoop it up it, knowing that the author was so racist. Then again, I suppose one cannot expect much more coming from a story written at a time when whites didnt know hardly anything about other races, and cultures.Ultimately, I believe th at there is a definitely a strong element of racism in both Heart Of Darkness and Apocalypse Now. However, I believe that the article on Achebe overreacts. Granted Conrad displays no respect for the African Culture, this is historical fact and granted that it is not good. It is a part of history in which it cannot be ignored, so it will neer happen again stating that black people should be grateful of the white because they were the ones who got them out of slavery in the first place.