Race Issues in Social Work Practice

Race Issues in Social Work rehearseWhite Social Workers pejorative sagaciousness of caustic families and the reinforcement of racist stereotypes through their intervention atomic human activity 18 central to the neighborly growing, i.e. social control, of black families and form the major avenues through which they nodeise black pot. (Dominelli, 1988)IntroductionWhile keeping the above statement in judging this paper ordain discuss how judging discharge be hard-hitting in assessing need and managing chance for every(prenominal) drug users. It testament do this by looking at how chores and conflicts ar addressed and in what ways this magnate be put inive for users of psychic wellness avails.AssessmentAssessment is a process that all users have to undergo in parliamentary law to confine what services they skill be em position to and how their needfully capacity vanquish be addressed. Social thespians who specialise in the battlefield of mental wellnes s argon bound by the 1995 represent which defines their responsibilities to wad with mental or physical disabilities.Disability is outlined as a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities (Brayne and Martin, 1999460).The tender Rights Act of 1998 is phrased in such a manner that local regimen now have a duty to act in ways that are conversant with the Act. Social role players servicing volume with mental wellness uncorrect sufficienties to wangle with the problems that they face. It is the social conveyers duty to help raise do by and resist for people with physical disabilities, with learning disabilities, and with mental health problems. This duty begins with an opinion of need for services, it is only at once such an assessment has taken place that social workers and local regimen will be able to decide whether they scum bag help with that need.In the 1980s the Tory Th atcher disposal brought market policies into the health service that included what is known as care in the community this meant that large numbers of psychiatric hospitals were closed. This resulted in those who were mentally impaired, along with a small number of psychotic patients being fulfil into the community. They did non receive proper treatment and a number of incidents created earth unrest. Thus, whenever a social worker makes an assessment for around cardinal with mental health difficulties they have a duty to do so with the concept of besides assessing every risk that they feel users might face or that they could demo to society. Under the 1990 NHS and Community Care Act (circular LAC (92) 12 any needs assessment that a social worker approachs needs to take into draw the followingThe capacity/incapacity of the mortal being assessedTheir preferences and aspirationsTheir living eventAny support they might have from relatives and friendsOther sources of helpWith find out to people with mental health problems and with other disabilities, just because local authorities have a duty to find out about such people in their area and offer help, does not depend on a knobs request for services rather it requires the social worker to carry out an assessment of any integrity in that class who might be eligible for services (Brayne and Martin, 1999). Once an assessment has been carried out and the clients needs identified and then social workers have a duty to help people with mental health problems obtain the benefits that they are entitled to. The social worker withal has a duty to visualize that the client is in accommodation that is suitable to their particular needs. The authority whitethorn need to provide extra support to enable a mortal to continue living in their own home or they may need to arrange a move to residential accommodation or long term hospital care. Thus working with this client group is a large and varied field and socia l workers are face with a number of different duties in this respect. These duties and responsibilities are further defined under rule and form _or_ system of government relating to the needs of people with mental and or physical disabilities.A social worker whose clients are in one of the aforementioned groups may find themselves visiting clients in a number of different settings. It may be the clients home, hospital, residential accommodation, or just abouttimes at the social workers place of employment. mostly the social worker will act as part of a team relations with a number of different cases and in separately one will need to be aware of the general legislative framework as it applies to that particular client group. Social workers are ask to write reports on every case that he/she is engaged with. This will then be seen by their supervisor and by the care care team. This helps in addressing client needs and determining a care package. It is also a way of determinin g whether the social worker has done their cheat in the best way possible i.e. a way that indues the service user and gives them some say in the decision making process. This is peculiarly relevant where mental health is concerned as there has been some speculation as to whether social workers and other mental health professionals deal with service users in ways that are non-prejudicial.Some research tends to rede that over the last fifteen years those who use mental health services have been treated in a prejudicial way. This is because (and government debates are also at fault here) this group of users have tended to be defined in terms of the risk they constitute to themselves and the wider society. This is despite all the evidence supporting the view that those with mental health problems are not generally a risk to society. Langow and Lindow (2004) argue that such a tightness on risk way that an individual so defined runs the risk of having decisions concerning their liv es taken out of their hands. This is certainly borne out by government policy proposals regarding people who are considered to be a risk to themselves or others. Langow and Lindow (ibid) corroborate that this concentration on risk means that social workers and other mental health workers ofttimestimes find it hard to distinguish the reasons why soulfulness may behave in an aggressive manner. Is it due to psychotic behaviour, or is it just that they feel dis authorise or feel themselves as having been subject to racial abuse? The danger here is simply to err in save of the psychosis rather than believing they have to take the risk that someone would not pose a threat to the rest of society. Service users are often not aware that they are being assessed in this way. The fact that staff might consider users to be a risk to others however, could have sedate implications for that persons future.Dilemmas and ConflictsIt is not always easy working with people with mental health probl ems. A social worker may undertake an assessment and then find that the client does not want the help that is on offer. This really can be problematic as the legislation implies that local authorities must make an assessment of needs once mental health problems or disability have been identified. This further implies that they will produce a care package to address those needs. If a client refuses to allow a social worker en sample then they are not able to do their job and undertake an assessment or provide services as required by the efficacious framework. If an assessment is made then the social worker has to try and identify areas where family and friends can help the person. When such arrangements break down and there are no alternatives in place then problems may arise. Thus a person who may previously have been assessed as being able to go forward in their own home may later have a need for either supported living (particularly in the case of people with mental health probl ems or learning disability) or for residential care. If a person is deemed unfit to live alone or is a problem to others then the social worker has a duty to call in the medical officer of health who then has to obtain an order from the magistrates court. removal to residential accommodation then collects the social worker in some other set of rules as to how the accommodation is financed. This is also pertinent to regular limited review of such accommodation and other welfare services that the client is entitled to.Clearly there are a growing number of legal and policy requirements that a social worker must adhere to when dealing with specific client groups. psychical health is an increasingly problematic area because new regulations are coming up all the time and the formulate is not always clear or precise. This means that the social workers job can be a minefield as they try to adhere to the needs and wishes of the client and yet remain within the legislative framework.Fac tors that Promote and Limit Service User Involvement in closing MakingCurrent debates on the needs and rights of services users show that although there has been a move to ensure individuals rights to equality of service, some service users still face discrimination. Under these circumstances it is vital that power imbalances between service users and professionals be acknowledged and the contributing factors addressed. Once they take after to such an acknowledgement the parties can then work together to minimalise any factors that contribute to the marginalisation and exclusion of some service users (Carr, 2004). Some of these issues might include the fact that there is still a tendency for some professionals to ignore service users views or to at least misinterpret them. This means that instead of being enabled through greater user participation, service users may end up feeling further disempowered. Institutional barriers have to be overcome, and the continuing use of professio nal jargon can also respond to exclude service users from the decision making process. Carr (2004) found that service users often saw such gaps as a disempowering and exclusionary factor, but, once aware of this fact, most professionals were more than happy to try to modify their language in order to encourage greater service user participation.It is sometimes very difficult for people with mental health problems to communicate their needs in a way that is fully understood by the professionals trying to assess them. in that respect is a need for different models and take aims of participation depending on the service users circumstances. Some service users will be so empowered by participation that they will go on to be entangled in how services are delivered, still others are not able to be truly involved at any recognisable level without the intervention of a third person. Thus advocacy is an important cistron of lower levels of service user participation. An advocate can hel p to empower people because service users will then have someone who is impartial, who can inform them as to what is available in terms of services and support and who will promote their best interests among other professionals and make sure that their wishes are made known. Carr (2004) notes that the service user movement has been instrumental in promoting the rights of peoples entitlement to as ordinary way of life as is possible. bulk with mental health problems may have multiple and complex needs, up to now under the 1998 Human Rights Act, they are entitled to be treated with dignity and local authorities have a duty to abide by the requirements of this Act (Moore, 2002).ConclusionEthical and effective social work should involve a thorough assessment of the needs of users with mental health problems and a care package that takes their problems and wishes into account. This should be tailored to suit an individuals needs and there should be room for changes and adjustments if the care package is not to become an imposition (Kerr et al, 2005). Where a person is not fully cognizant of what is happening then anti-oppressive practice should involve the use of an entirely strong-minded advocate.Effective social work is client centred and this is achieved through the social workers own reflective practice. If criticisms and accusations of prejudicial attitudes are to be avoided then it might be argued that advocacy, coupled with reflexive and effective social work practice should bring an end to service user disempowerment and become one that assesses need and manages risk in a way that is beneficial for some(prenominal) users and professionals.BibliographyBrayne and Martin 6th ed. 1999 Law for Social Workers capital of the United Kingdom, Blackstone PressCarr, S. 2004 Has Service User meshing Made a Difference to Social Care Services? London, SCIE part of Health (2002b) Information Strategy for Older People (ISOP)in England. London Department of HealthDun ning, A. 2005 Information, Advice and Advocacy for Older People York, Joseph Rowntree FoundationLangow and Lindow. 2004. Mental health service users and their involvement in risk assessment and focusing Findings, Joseph Rowntree FoundationLeason, K. 2005 Fear and freedom Community Care April 14th 2005 p. 32-34Moore, S. 2002 tertiary Edition Social Welfare Alive Cheltenham, Nelson ThornesRuch, G. 2000 Self and social work Towards an integrated model of learning Journal of Social Work Practice Volume 14, no. 2 November 1st 2000Disability Discrimination Act 1995 http//www.drc-gb.org/thelaw/thedda.asphttp//www.after16.org.uk/pages/law5.html