The Errors in Affirmative Action :: Critical Thinking Essays

Although much of the reasoning cig bette plausive Action is good, it goes wrong in a few major ways. approbative action is meant to require an end to discrepancy. In trying to do so, though, it elevates the so-called disadvantaged minorities above other groups. In addition, the members of the particular minority groups are stereotyped according to the group they are in quite than being looked at as an individual. favourable action also makes the assertion that minority groups are, in fact, disadvantaged. Another result is that the tables are turned and whites are discriminated against. Lastly, and most importantly, Affirmative Action can force people to go against their religious beliefs, and in doing so, it breaks the First Amendment to the composing. To begin with, Affirmative Action is meant to bring an end to inequality. In reality, it creates more discrimination in many divergent ways. For example, members of minorities are elevated above those in other groups. As th e hold back states, Affirmative Action seeks to correct the effects of past discrimination by favoring the groups who were previously disadvantaged. Favoring one group isnt any way of solving discrimination problems it just creates more dissension between groups. According to Merriam-Websters Collegiate Dictionary, discrimination means to mark or perceive the distinguishing or peculiar features of. Affirmative Action directly creates discrimination. People of minority groups are stereotyped, often incorrectly, as being disadvantaged, simply because they are a member of that group. Not and is it stereotyping of minorities, but also of whites. It creates the assumption that whites are better off than minorities. Affirmative Action looks at the members of a group and makes assumptions, stereotyping the members in the group alternatively than taking each member of the group and examining that person. Members of minority groups often note inferior because, as members of those groups, they get special privileges. According to the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the government cannot make laws respecting an establishment of religion. The government cannot both plump for Affirmative Action and uphold the first amendment at the same time. The goals, actions, and restrictions resulting from Affirmative Action can easily be against a persons religious beliefs. Take, for example, beliefs on homo informality. What happens to a religious organization that is against homosexuality and wants to have only great members of their religion hired. According to Affirmative Action, they cant discriminate based on sexual orientation or religion.